Friday, 3 January 2014

A Tale of Two Sherlocks


 I confess it, I love Sherlock Holmes! In all his guises. (The same is true, I might add, of Doctor Who and James Bond, two of my other favourite things). I love the original stories by Arthur Conan Doyle, which I read as a teenager,
(picture taken of the statue in Baker Street by me)



 the bizarre yet endearing Soviet Sherlock Holmes,
(thanks to the Internet for this pic)


the 1980s Jeremy Brett Sherlock Holmes now oft-repeated on ITV 3 (fans of Sherlock should note mousachio’d Watson – it is tradition!)


(thanks to the Internet for this pic)


the recent adaptation of Sherlock Holmes for the silver screen with Jude Law and Robert Downey Junior and a delectable Hans Zimmer soundtrack (more below)


last but not least, I love the BBC Sherlock. When this first came out I was a little bit annoyed, because I had loved the film version which was released slightly before and thought the BBC had sunk so low as to copy the concept. This was not helped by the fact that David Arnold’s soundtrack (particularly at first) had similar rhythms and sounds to Hans Zimmer’s. But I have warmed to it. 


I even quite like The Mentalist, which has streaks of Sherlock Holmes charm, though it isn’t as good as the above.

I don’t see liking Sherlock Holmes therefore as an either/or thing. I have heard a great deal of indifferent and critical reactions to the Sherlock Holmes films. I enjoy them because, accurate to the books or not, they evoke the nineteenth century charm of the originals, and although Robert Downey Junior’s portrayal is not how I imagined Sherlock Holmes from reading the books (the Brett version is far closer) they are fun. Really fun. I like the rogueish charm of Robert Downey Junior’s Sherlock, the twinkle in his eye, his insouciance, and his bromance with Jude Law’s Watson. (I quite like Jude Law in this role. Partly because he is British). Friends of mine will know that I like the nineteenth century. I enjoy spotting and photographing London’s architecture and although not a diehard Steampunk person, I find these films full of The Smoke for which London was so aptly nicknamed… For similar reasons, I am a fan of BBC’s Ripper Street which, after 2 interesting series, is going to be axed. [ed. it returned to Amazon since this blog was first published]
Also, let's be clear on this point, I am a massive fan of Hans Zimmer’s soundtrack. I listen to it a lot…

As for Sherlock? They are even more different from the books. At first, I did not like the insistence on including contemporary trends, such as hashtags and text messages, mainly because I think they try to hard to keep it hip or cool,  (or whatever the word is these days) and the idea of Sherlock texting his nemesis Moriarty just lacks a certain charm! I don’t swoon when Benedict Cumberbatch shakes his dark locks or swoops around in that coat, but he brings to the role something of the coldness of, say Brett’s portrayal, combined with some of Downey Junior’s charm. I think he and Martin Freeman are brilliant actors without which the drama would not work as well. Again, the dynamic between the two is amazing. Some people might argue that Sherlock is ridiculous (anyone who saw the Doctor Who 50th Anniversary Special and Christmas Special might see the fingerprints of Moffat here). However, for me this is enjoyable because it is funny and entertaining. Without any spoilers, Sherlock’s meetings with Watson in the episode just aired were extremely funny.

I love the  London setting too. There is some great stuff on the Internet about this, so I won’t repeat it, but for more, see this article on Timeout.
http://now-here-this.timeout.com/2014/01/02/the-london-underground-according-to-sherlock/

What is it that I like about Sherlock/Holmes? What do other people like about him? Like Doctor Who and James Bond, but for slightly different reasons, he is impossible. His survival is pretty unlikely, and he is a genius (in his own way) who fights for good. A real hero. He provides a sense of continuity that we are all looking for. This level of genius and heroism is reassuring to modern audiences, perhaps because so many of our historical heroes have been deconstructed, and so few people believe in saints any more. Perhaps Sherlock reminds us of the ‘impossible’ in other people. After all, we all know people whose habits infuriate us, or people whose intensely rational approach is extremely annoying.
I find it immensely reassuring that Doyle produced this figure of genius, who is irritatingly intelligent and rational, and two teams have recently brought to the screen this character without making him seem smaller or less sharp. But they use this sense of his impossible to humorous and entertaining effect. Isn’t Sherlock/Holmes annoying? Annoying but endearing.

Long live Sherlock Holmes!